文章摘要
盛丽娜. CiteScore与影响因子评价对比研究——基于2016年SCI收录的美国眼科学期刊. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(4): 321-325
CiteScore与影响因子评价对比研究——基于2016年SCI收录的美国眼科学期刊
Comparative study of CiteScore and impact factor: Based on American ophthalmology journals indexed in SCI in 2016
投稿时间:2017-09-07  修订日期:2017-12-22
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201709070757
中文关键词: CiteScore  影响因子  眼科学期刊  期刊评价
英文关键词: CiteScore  Impact factor  Ophthalmology journal  Journal evaluation
摘要点击次数: 86
全文下载次数: 87
基金项目:河南省高等学校哲学社会科学基础研究重大项目
作者单位E-mail
盛丽娜 新乡医学院期刊社《眼科新进展》编辑部,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003
河南省科技期刊研究中心,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003 
379270442@qq.com 
中文摘要:
      【目的】 分析Scopus数据库新推出的期刊评价指标CiteScore与JCR经典指标影响因子对期刊评价效力的差异。【方法】 以2016年同时被SCI和Scopus数据库收录的美国眼科学期刊为研究对象,以问卷调查评分结果为标准,对比分析CiteScore与影响因子(IF<sub>2</sub>)对期刊评价效力的异同。同时计算各期刊3年引证时间窗口影响因子(IF<sub>3</sub>),及按照CiteScore计算公式获得的3年引证时间窗口影响因子(IF<sub>3T</sub>),并对上述评价指标进行对比分析。【结果】 Wilcoxon检验结果显示,CiteScore较IF<sub>2</sub>、IF<sub>3</sub>小,但较IF<sub>3T</sub>大,差异均有统计学意义。CiteScore较IF<sub>2</sub>、IF<sub>3</sub>、IF<sub>3T</sub>更接近于正态分布,离散度更小。Pearson相关性分析结果表明,CiteScore、IF<sub>2</sub>、IF<sub>3</sub>、IF<sub>3T</sub>与问卷调查得分之间均呈显著正相关;各指标与问卷调查得分的相关系数由大到小分别为CiteScore(0.727)、IF<sub>2</sub>(0.700)、IF<sub>3</sub>(0.700)、IF<sub>3T</sub>(0.565)。【结论】CiteScore对美国眼科学期刊的评价效力与IF<sub>2</sub>、IF<sub>3</sub>类似。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] This study aims to analyze the difference in the effectiveness of journal evaluation between CiteScore in Scopus database and impact factor in JCR. [Methods] Taking the American ophthalmology journals indexed in both SCI and Scopus databases in 2016 as examples, we compared the similarities and differences between the CiteScore and the impact factors(IF<sub>2</sub>)on the effectiveness of the journal evaluation using the questionnaire score. At the same time, the impact factor in 3-year citation time window(IF<sub>3</sub>)and the 3-year citation window impact factor obtained from the CiteScore formula(IF<sub>3T</sub>)were calculated and compared. [Findings] Wilcoxon test results show that CiteScore is smaller than IF<sub>2</sub> and IF<sub>3</sub>, but larger than IF<sub>3T</sub>, the differences are statistically significant. CiteScore is closer to the normal distribution than IF<sub>2</sub>, IF<sub>3</sub> and IF<sub>3T</sub>, and the degree of dispersion is smaller. Pearson correlation analysis shows that there exist significant positive correlations between CiteScore, IF<sub>2</sub>, IF<sub>3</sub>, IF<sub>3T</sub> and questionnaire scores. The correlation coefficients of each index and questionnaire scores from big to small are CiteScore(0. 727), IF<sub>2</sub>(0. 700), IF<sub>3</sub>(0. 700), IF<sub>3T</sub>(0. 565), respectively. [Conclusions] For the American ophthalmic journals, the effectiveness of CiteScore is similar to IF<sub>2</sub> and IF<sub>3</sub>.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看