文章摘要
杨毓丽,高健,秦奋. 期刊CiteScore评价研究. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(4): 326-333
期刊CiteScore评价研究
CiteScore evaluation of academic journals
投稿时间:2017-10-12  修订日期:2018-01-29
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201710120863
中文关键词: CiteScore  IF2  IF5
英文关键词: CiteScore  IF2  IF5
摘要点击次数: 281
全文下载次数: 254
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
杨毓丽 大连理工大学图书馆大连市甘井子区凌工路2号 116024 yuli.yang@dlut.edu.cn 
高健 大连理工大学图书馆大连市甘井子区凌工路2号 116024  
秦奋 大连理工大学图书馆大连市甘井子区凌工路2号 116024  
中文摘要:
      【目的】 比较CiteScore与影响因子(IF)在学术期刊评价中的异同。【方法】 以2012—2016年Scopus与Web of Science数据库同时收录的期刊为数据来源,通过R语言测评样本期刊CiteScore指数与IF数据库中2年影响因子(IF2)、5年影响因子(IF5)的相关性。【结果】 2012—2016年期刊的Citescore值均与IF2及IF5呈线性相关。CiteScore统计范围涵盖所有文章类型,因此许多综合类期刊的CiteScore值低于IF值,但对于只发表研究论文和综述论文的期刊,CiteScore值高于IF值。【结论】 CiteScore覆盖面更广,并且兼顾IF2和IF5两个数值的特点,期刊IF计算方式与期刊收录学科仍存在问题。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] This study aims to compare the difference of journal evaluation systems between CiteScore and impact factor(IF). [Methods] We compared the CiteScore and IF based on the data from 2012 to 2016. The relationships between CiteScore index and IF index of 2 years and 5 years were evaluated by R programming language. [Findings] CiteScore has linear correlated with IF2 and IF5. CiteScore includes research papers, reviews, letters, notes, editorials, and other types of articles indexed by Scopus. For the journals with varieties of article types, the CiteScore indexes are lower than IF2 and IF5. In contrast, the CiteScore indexes are higher than IF2 and IF5 when the journals only have research papers and reviews. [Conclusions] CiteScore covers more journals than Web of Science and has the same characteristics with IF2 and IF5, but the calculation way of CiteScore and the fields of the journal coverage still exist some problems.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看