文章摘要
张玲. 基于开放式网络平台系统的科技期刊同行评议新模式研究. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(11): 1122-1126
基于开放式网络平台系统的科技期刊同行评议新模式研究
A new peer review pattern for scientific journals based on the open system of network platform
投稿时间:2018-05-14  修订日期:2018-08-14
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201805140427
中文关键词: 科技期刊  开放性同行评议  网络平台  新模式
英文关键词: Scientific journal  Open peer review  Network platform  New pattern
摘要点击次数: 82
全文下载次数: 120
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
张玲 南方医科大学珠江医院《中华神经医学杂志》编辑部广东省广州市工业大道中253号 510282 gracedd@126.com 
中文摘要:
      【目的】 研究同行评议网络平台构建方法,探索适合我国国情的科技期刊同行评议新模式。【方法】 参考国际上新近出现的Peerage of Science、 Publons、 The Winnower等平台模式,提出基于开放式网络平台系统的构建方法,并总结其特点、工作流程及运营方式。【结果】 开放式网络平台系统由独立于期刊社的第三方组织搭建。借助新平台,同行评议工作从被动接受变为主动选择,从面向单个期刊社变为面向科研整体,从封闭式评议变为开放式评议。【结论】 基于开放式网络平台系统的科技期刊同行评议新模式可有效缩短论文发表周期,提高同行评议效率,是同行评议发展的新趋势。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] This paper aims to study the construction method of peer review network platform and explore a new model for peer review of scientific journals, which suits for our national conditions. [Methods] Based on the cases of Peerage of Science, Publons, and The Winnower, this paper proposed the construction methods of the new model for peer review and summarized its features, review processes, operation patterns, and so on. [Findings] Platform should be constructed by third-party organizations which are independent of journal press. With the help of the new platform, peer review has changed from passive acceptance to active selection, from single journal to overall scientific research, from closed review to open review. [Conclusions] The new pattern based on open network platform system could shorten the publishing process of papers and improve the efficiency of peer review, and it is the newest trend of the development of peer review.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看