文章摘要
霍振响,屈李纯. 高校科技期刊审稿人审稿数量的分布规律及思考. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(11): 1136-1140
高校科技期刊审稿人审稿数量的分布规律及思考
Distribution law and thoughts on the review number of reviewers of scientific journals sponsored by universities
投稿时间:2018-05-29  修订日期:2018-09-03
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201805290479
中文关键词: 高校科技期刊  审稿数量  二八定律  长尾理论  审稿周期
英文关键词: Scientific journal sponsored by university  Review number  Pareto's principle  Long tail theory  Review process
摘要点击次数: 83
全文下载次数: 119
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2018RWSK44)。
作者单位E-mail
霍振响 《西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部陕西省咸阳市杨凌区西农路22号 712100 h22079@163.com 
屈李纯 《西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部陕西省咸阳市杨凌区西农路22号 712100  
中文摘要:
      【目的】 挖掘高校科技期刊审稿人审稿数量的分布规律,提出基于审稿人细分群体特征的优化措施及建议。【方法】 从期刊网站调取审稿人审稿数据(截至2018-05-20),分析其分布规律,同时参考部分调查结果,提出有针对性的审稿人队伍建设措施。【结果】 审稿数量居前的审稿人符合二八定律,审稿数量少的审稿人则具有典型的“长尾”特征。审稿数量居前20%的人审稿周期较短,审稿逾期的也较少。【结论】 针对具有不同特征的审稿人群体,应采取不同的维护措施,以优化审稿人队伍,提高审稿质量。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] This paper aims to explore the distribution law of the review number of reviewers of scientific journals sponsored by universities, and propose optimization measures and suggestions based on the characteristics of reviewers. [Methods] The reviewer's review data(as of 2018-05-20)was obtained from the journal website to explore the rules. At the same time, we referenced some of the results of the questionnaire survey to propose construction measures for targeted reviewer team. [Findings] The review with the highest number of reviewers is in compliance with the Pareto's principle, and the reviewers with a small review number have the typical long tail characteristics. The top 20% of the reviewers have shorter review process and fewer review deadlines. [Conclusions] We should adopt different maintenance measures for reviewer groups with different characteristics to optimize the reviewer team and improve the quality of review.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看