文章摘要
史小丽. 文献计量视角下高校自然科学学报现状及制约因素分析. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(11): 1160-1164
文献计量视角下高校自然科学学报现状及制约因素分析
Bibliometric analysis on status and hindering factors about Chinese university journals of natural sciences
投稿时间:2018-06-19  修订日期:2018-09-14
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201806190532
中文关键词: 高校自然科学学报  中国科技核心期刊  引证报告  评价指标  制约因素
英文关键词: University journals of natural sciences  Source journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database  Journal citation report  Journal evaluation index  Hindering factor
摘要点击次数: 73
全文下载次数: 109
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
史小丽 《宁波大学学报》编辑部浙江省宁波市江北区风华路818号 315211 shixiaoli@nbu.edu.cn 
中文摘要:
      【目的】 采用期刊评价指标的统计分析数据阐明目前高校自然科学学报(以下简称“高校学报”)在中国科技期刊中的学术地位和影响力,指出新时期制约高校学报整体发展的主要因素。【方法】 以进入中国科学技术信息研究所遴选出的2017年中国科技核心期刊目录(自然科学卷)中高校学报为研究对象,结合同年《中国科技期刊引证报告(扩刊版)》中期刊评价指标,统计分析高校学报在中国科技核心期刊中的占比,及其各项评价指标与其他核心期刊和非核心学报的差异。【结果】 2017年中国科技核心期刊中高校学报占比14.6%,与其他核心期刊相比,高校学报整体评价指标偏弱;不同层次、类别高校学报的评价指标差异明显。【结论】 以期刊评价指标衡量,高校学报整体学术质量和影响力偏低。现阶段制约高校学报整体健康发展的主要因素有办刊定位固化、主办高校综合创新能力不均衡、科研评价体系的偏向,以及僵化的办刊模式和缺乏竞争的办刊环境。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] This study aims to estimate academic quality and influence of the Chinese university journals of natural sciences, i. e. university journals, in the source journals of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database(CSTPCD)using journal evaluation indexes and point out hindering factors of university journals at present. [Methods] Taking the university journals selected into the source journals of the CSTPCD in 2017 as research objects, the proportion of the university journals in the source journals of CSTPCD was calculated, and their evaluation indexes were analyzed according to Chinese Scientific Journal Citation Reports(Expanded Edition)in 2017. The differences of evaluation indicators from three kinds of journals were analyzed. [Findings] The university journals account for 14. 6% of the source journals of the CSTPCD in 2017; and the evaluation indexes of the university journals are low compared with those of the other source journals of the CSTPCD. There are obvious differences in the evaluation indexes between the university journals in/out of the source journals of the CSTPCD. [Conclusions] The academic quality and influence of the university journals in the source journals of the CSTPCD are relatively poor according to the journal evaluation indexes. At present, the hindering factors of the university journals are as follows: fixed orientation, imbalance among universities in regards of comprehensive innovation, bias of research assessment system, inflexible publishing mode and uncompetitive working atmosphere.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看