文章摘要
黄历. 第三方审稿平台及其在国内科技期刊领域实施的可行性. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019, 29(1): 29-33
第三方审稿平台及其在国内科技期刊领域实施的可行性
Independent peer review platform and feasibility of applying in Chinese scientific journals
投稿时间:2018-07-15  修订日期:2018-09-20
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201807150622
中文关键词: 中文科技期刊  学术出版  同行评议  第三方审稿  可行性分析
英文关键词: Chinese scientific journals  Scientific publishing  Peer review  Independent peer review  Feasibility analysis
摘要点击次数: 87
全文下载次数: 165
基金项目:中国科协精品科技期刊工程项目(2015KJQK003-1);2016—2018年度高水平高校学术期刊支持计划B类项目。
作者单位E-mail
黄历 上海海洋大学学报编辑部上海市浦东新区沪城环路999号 201306 lihuang@shou.edu.cn 
中文摘要:
      【目的】 借鉴国际科技期刊同行评议的经验,进一步推动中文科技期刊同行评议方式的研究、改革和实践。【方法】 通过文献综述和网站调研的方法,介绍国际上第三方审稿平台的运行模式和发展状况,提出创新国内科技期刊审稿方式的建议。【结果】 独立于期刊的第三方审稿服务颠覆了传统模式中审稿人、作者、编辑之间的关系,具有公开、公平和公正的特点,既可以加快期刊内容的传播速度,又能提高审稿人的积极性,还能提高稿源质量和期刊质量。【结论】 由期刊集群建立第三方审稿服务平台,可规范服务流程,在我国科技期刊领域中具有可行性。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] Taking examples by the experience in peer review of international scientific journals, we will further promote the research, reform, and practice of peer review methods in Chinese scientific journals. [Methods] Through the literature review and websites research, the operation mode and development status of the independent peer review platforms abroad were introduced, and the practical feasibility of implementing the independent peer review in Chinese scientific journal publishing was discussed. [Findings] The independent peer review service completely subverts the relationship among reviewers, authors, and editors in the traditional model, which is characterized by openness, fairness, and impartiality. The speed of content dissemination can be accelerated by the enthusiasm of reviewers, and the quality of manuscripts and journals can be improved. [Conclusions] It is feasible to establish an independent peer review service platform and to standardize service process by a journal group in the field of Chinese scientific journals.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看